Edwards Campaign Picks Up The Tab for Pricey Haircuts

Harv it is painfully obvious you are your biggest fan. But you do get an "A" for effort on complete sentences. But since you actually didn't say anything worth reading other than a brief rant on "Why the war sucks". You get an "F" for something I really can't say due to risk of being banned. A boob? You got me!! But instead of making me look like a fool you made yourself look like a JA!

 

Yes, and probably the wrong ones at the wring time. :lol: :lol:

The average person is not capable of running a business much less a country, which is why most businesses do not survive to see their 5th aniversary. I agree the average person needs to be involved but they have to learn as they go and as they learn they become less average and more above average.

I know Harley is already above average because her business is surviving, so she is not the best example of an average person.

 

Dude, seriously...stick to the issue. I never once discussed myself in this post.

Oh, you mean nothing worth reading besides the obvious comparison between gross overspending in Iraq for a failed war in order to put a campaign haircut in perspective?

...and I see you have graduated to pictures. Or maybe demoted due to your failure at those same complete sentences.

The point is simple and you can't argue against the facts if you read the entire article. While it may seem silly to some of us to spend $400 on a stylist to do our hair and makeup, none of us are running for president are we? If we were, we certainly wouldn't trust the JCC Beauty School to get us ready for a nationally televised debate. Think about it.

 

Maybe overspent his limit but check this out!


LOOK OVER THE DESCRIPTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING TWO HOUSES AND SEE IF YOU
CAN TELL WHICH BELONGS TO AN ENVIRONMENTALIST.
HOUSE # 1:

A 20-room mansion (not including 8 bathrooms) heated by natural gas.
Add on a pool (and a pool house) and a separate guest house all heated
by gas. In ONE MONTH ALONE this mansion consumes more energy than the
average American household in an ENTIRE YEAR. The average bill for
electricity
and natural gas runs over $2,400.00 per month. In natural gas alone (which
last time we checked was a fossil fuel), this property consumes more than
20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not in a
northern or Midwestern "snow belt," either. It's in the South.



HOUSE # 2:

Designed by an architecture professor at a leading national university,
This house incorporates every "green" feature current home construction
can provide. The house contains only 4,000 square feet (4 bedrooms) and is
nestled on arid high prairie in the American southwest. A central closet
in the house holds geothermal heat pumps drawing ground water through
pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground. The water (usually 67 degrees F.)
heats the house in winter and cools it in summer. The system uses no
fossil fuels such as oil or natural gas, and it consumes 25% of the
electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system. Rainwater
from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground
cistern.
Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underground purifying
tanks and then into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land
surrounding the house. Flowers and shrubs native to the area blend the
property into the surrounding rural landscape.



So the answer is:



HOUSE # 1 (20 room energy guzzling mansion) is outside of Nashville,
Tennessee. It is the abode of that renowned environmentalist (and
filmmaker) Al Gore.



HOUSE # 2 (model eco-friendly house) is on a ranch near Crawford,
Texas. Also known as "the Texas White House," it is the private
residence of the President of the United States, George W. Bush. So
whose house is gentler on the environment? Yet another story you WON'T
hear on CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC or read about in the New York Times or
the Washington Post. Indeed, for Mr. Gore, it's truly "an inconvenient
truth."

NO KIDDING

 

Curious, this is an old and questionable post that has been beat to death in another thread in the other forum.

 

So sorry, I am relatively new to this board and was not aware that it had been previously posted. Just thought it was interesting. Again, sorry for the repost.

 

No problem, sorry if I came off rude! 8)

Here are the main Global Warming Posts and the first one was dedicated to Al!

http://4042.appcomm.net/4042forums/showthread.php?t=11693&highlight=warming

http://4042.appcomm.net/4042forums/showthread.php?t=11904&highlight=warming

http://4042.appcomm.net/4042forums/showthread.php?t=10729&highlight=warming

http://4042.appcomm.net/4042forums/showthread.php?t=11928&highlight=warming

 

Nope, didn't think you were rude, just glad you sent these links. I'll check em' out and try to stay better informed.

 

OK OK OK I can't read normally!!!

 

You got that right, sista! :mrgreen:

 

Aww, big hugs sweetie!!!

 

Edwards to reimburse the campaign for hair cuts

http://dwb.newsobserver.com/politics/ncwire_politics/story/3025145p-9444494c.html

Hillary is even more expensive.

 

:shock::shock:

 

Dude it doesn't matter if they chisled her a new cranium. Nothing is going to help her looks. She needs hizelp. Her name does NOT match the face. She is Janet Reno lite.

 

Sounds like if she becomes a red head than you are on board.

 

I do have a weakness there yes. When it comes to red heads I am like a deer in headlights.

 

http://www.qctimes.com/articles/2007/04/19//news/local/doc4626f3bd6f2f2920813459.txt

 

What I do not understand is if he pays that much shouldnt his hair look better than it looks?He has a 3rd grader look to his hair and he looks like hes wearing make-up also.Did they mention hair plugs maybe thats what he got?

 

I guess being ugly myself I wonder what does it matter? Personally I think she is very presentable and should be acceptable to the shallow and the deep alike.