Anyone know of a good Pediatrician that doesn't push vaccines?

Discussion in 'Discussion Group' started by ItsallPolitical, Jul 9, 2008.

  1. Clif

    Clif Guest

    I did not say they would, I said I did. Please read my post rather than try to guess what I'm going to say.
     
  2. Sherry A.

    Sherry A. Well-Known Member

    Not guessing what you are going to say. Made a statement that I felt was relevant because "I" did not take it as anything to do with sexual preference and was wondering why you did.

    Either way, I thought the picture was funny and still do. Not much more to debate about, between us, on the picture.

    Sherry
     
  3. Sherry A.

    Sherry A. Well-Known Member

    I never heard or read about any of the items you, Nevil and KDs are discussing, but as usual I learn something new everyday.

    Sherry
     
  4. nevilock

    nevilock Well-Known Member

    Pennsic is amazing. i was at pensic 32 (or somewhere around there.) nothing like armies of people in plate armor pushing a "bridge" (Really a row of confining hay bales), or a huge multi-sided interkingdom melee.
     
  5. Wayne Stollings

    Wayne Stollings Well-Known Member

    My brother-in-law and his wife attend regularly. He is a decent archer and she is a champion archer for their kingdom.
     
  6. Hught

    Hught Well-Known Member

    The wife and I used to do some saber fighting at Renaissance festivals (for our Fencing Clubs) I see these guys going at with those huge swords and I don't know how they last.

    Give me a good light cutting weapon any time.
     
  7. Melynda

    Melynda Well-Known Member

    This should be interesting to follow

    Court allows family to sue vaccine maker

    Associated Press
    Tuesday, October 07, 2008



    ATLANTA --- The Georgia Supreme Court allowed an Atlanta couple's lawsuit against a vaccine manufacturer to go forward, upholding a first-of-its-kind ruling by an appellate court that had drawn fierce opposition from the vaccine industry.

    The court's unanimous decision Monday concluded that a 1986 federal law that has been used to block other suits against vaccine companies does not bar the suit from Marcelo and Carolyn Ferrari from going to trial.
    It upheld a ruling by the Georgia Court of Appeals, which became the first appellate court in the nation to hold that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act does not pre-empt state law.
    The Ferrari family asked the Georgia Supreme Court to rule that vaccine maker American Home Products Corp., now known as Wyeth, can be held liable for damages in a civil case involving their son, Stefan.
    The family believes they can prove that thimerosal, the mercury-based preservative, caused their son's disability. Stefan, they say, was a talkative toddler before he got a round of boosters shots when he was 18 months old. The boy, now 10, hasn't spoken since.
    The case has drawn protests from the vaccine industry and powerful lobbying groups from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to the conservative Pacific Legal Foundation.
    Seven other state courts have ruled that the federal laws pre-empt any state law that might give families the power to challenge the vaccine manufacturers.
    But the Georgia Court of Appeals became the first appellate court in the nation to rule that the federal law doesn't take precedence over state tort rules, calling the federal statute unclear.
    At hearings in May, attorneys for the Madison, N.J.-based company argued that other judges have concluded Congress wanted the federal law to pre-empt state rules, in part so that manufacturers aren't subjected to a mishmash of different state standards.
    Wyeth spokesman Doug Petkus said the company would appeal Monday's decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. He said other courts have agreed that the federal law supersedes state claims for injuries if the vaccines are prepared with FDA-approved designs and are accompanied by the proper warnings.
    The Ferraris' attorney, Lanny Bridgers, contended that the federal law was meant to supplement, not displace, state law.
    The Georgia Supreme Court's ruling, written by Justice George Carley, said the federal law "does not pre-empt all design defect claims against vaccine manufacturers."
    Instead, the court held, vaccine manufacturers must prove on a case-by-case basis that the side effect of the particular vaccine were unavoidable to be immune from defective design claims.
    Families have claimed in court that thimerosal is linked to autism, although government lawyers say the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has rejected any link.
     

Share This Page