Drug Test

Discussion in 'Discussion Group' started by bettyboop, Feb 12, 2009.

  1. bettyboop

    bettyboop Guest

    I got this send to me by email and thought I would share it.

    THE JOB - URINE TEST

    (I HAVE TO PASS A URINE TEST FOR MY JOB... SO I AGREE 100%

    Like a lot of folks in this state, I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test with which I have no problem. What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test. Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them? Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their ***, doing drugs, while I work. . . ... Can you imagine how much money the state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check?
    Whoever wrote this one deserves a HUGE pat on the back!)
     
  2. monaco177

    monaco177 Guest

    :iagree::iagree::iagree::iagree::iagree:
     
  3. carolinasun

    carolinasun Well-Known Member

    Now that is a great idea. I have two in my neighborhood that would have to get a job, I have had to work everyday to make a living. These two women do nothing and have their drugs delivered to them, they are getting assistance. I asked one why she didn't get a job and she said I would have to get up in the morning and be there at a certain time. I can't do that!:oops::oops::banghead:
     
  4. michelle

    michelle Well-Known Member

    I think this is the greatest idea I have seen in a long time. I personally know a few who would have to do without and I would love to see it.
     
  5. bettyboop

    bettyboop Guest

    I know a lot of people that fit this profile. I know of a girl that had 3 kids, got a job making $7 hour 40 hours a week. She was getting a check, around $400 a month. So the Social Services made her get a job, so they could cut out the check. Her job paid her about $1100, before taxes. When she got the job she also got daycare paid for all three babies (8 month twins and a 2 year old) which is about $375 a week. ($1550 a month). She was getting food stamps for the first 2 months. After 10 weeks of work she got a notice that she was losing her food stamps, so what did she do! SHE QUIT HER JOB!!
    My thinking on this is let her keep getting the $400 a month and look after her own kids!! This would save the state over $1000 a month. And let someone who wants to work and be somebody get the daycare assistance.
     
  6. KellBell

    KellBell Well-Known Member

    this is a great idea...but I don't think it could be utilized without a lot moaning and groaning and general government BS.
     
  7. bandmom

    bandmom Well-Known Member

    and then you have to pay for all the tests, pee cups, people to execute the test and tons of paperwork - so by then - they probably wouldn't save any money after all :banghead:
     
  8. KellBell

    KellBell Well-Known Member


    EXACTLY!!!:mrgreen:
     
  9. Harvey

    Harvey Well-Known Member

    Keep in mind that many industries require a drug test to ensure the safety of other workers. They don't need some dope-head on a machine press cutting off co-workers fingers.

    That being said the argument could be made both ways about a welfare recipient posing a safety hazrd as well. A) no place of work = noone to injure B) high as heck and out driving to the ESC when he crashes and kills someone.
     
  10. CraigSPL

    CraigSPL Well-Known Member



    Ah but think of the increase in employment and new buildings needed for such a task. Would be a boost to the economey.



    Craig
     

Share This Page