Incorporation?

Discussion in 'Discussion Group' started by Slate, Jun 15, 2009.

  1. Pirate96

    Pirate96 Guest

    Hence the inherent rub! In a lot of these cases many small places do this and then a different structure gets elected and many more services than the 4 or 5 are started and taxes get out of control and people are paying for the things they left other places for.
     
  2. sassymom

    sassymom Well-Known Member

    True but then again know who you are voting for.. also check the tax rates for Clayton and Garner..

    They are both high..
     
  3. sassymom

    sassymom Well-Known Member

    Gotcha, you could always take the lead and form your own meetings...

    GL
     
  4. kaci

    kaci Well-Known Member

    i would love to be on a committee or help getting things going but my job prevents me taking lead so come on someone step up and at least let's get the research started.
     
  5. sassymom

    sassymom Well-Known Member

  6. Pirate96

    Pirate96 Guest

    Yes they are in my opinion, but I would also rather fight and make the government of the people not allow forced annexation rather than make another town that probably will have as high if not higher tax rates just based on economy of scale.
     
  7. kaci

    kaci Well-Known Member

    if only that were possible. Fought that battle in a much larger and much more organized area in VA, took a couple years but the annexation won out anyway and what we got were higher taxes for no better services - promises that never came to fruition - would just hate to see that happen again here.
     
  8. sassymom

    sassymom Well-Known Member

    yep too many people don't care until its to late.. ask all the other towns around here that have fought it. Not many of the have won the battle.
     
  9. Slate

    Slate Well-Known Member

    Clayton seems to be getting closer and closer to us. Did anyone notice the new Clayton city limit sign just before the new hospital?
     

Share This Page