Are you nervous with the decisions Obama is making?

Discussion in 'Discussion Group' started by browns rule, Jun 16, 2009.

  1. Sherry A.

    Sherry A. Well-Known Member

    Why should it cost Obama a re-election? It happened before his watch. He's just trying to push those vehicles so we can at least break even....keep up big guy.

    Sherry
     
  2. Panther Crazy

    Panther Crazy Well-Known Member

    And therein lies the problem. Should the President of the United States be pushing any brand of vehicle? You just made a better arguement against Obama's policies than any conservative I've seen.
     
  3. Steeler_Fan

    Steeler_Fan Well-Known Member

    Are you nervous with the decisions Obama is making? I sure am. Never supported him.
     
  4. seabee

    seabee Guest

    Well you support the Stealers... whats the difference. :jester::jester:

    And Wulf you should also be ashamed.... :jester::jester:

    :cheers::cheers:
     
  5. ddrdan

    ddrdan Well-Known Member

    Funny you mentioned that. I caught hell from the majority of the conservatives on here for not voting. I didn't vote because neither of the party systems candidates were viable leaders in my view.

    In this last election they were screaming some people shouldn't vote. I will give them this; they are the 'typical' half of the party system. They will flip flop their views to achieve the objective of winning at all cost.

    And I continue with that stance today. I do what's good for America in my view. Not the Party System. The GOP went off the wall with power lunacy and played stupid games in governing the people. I stopped that with a vote in what's good for America. My vote didn't address all my views but it did stop the power lunacy.

    It's a new age of technology. We have the means to vote and govern as individuals without corrupt representatives. Our population in 1776 was 2.5 million and it took 4 days, in good weather, to get to Philadelphia from here. Representatives were a necessity.

    We are now 300 million strong and it takes 1 hour by plane and a nano second by internet. The founders could never envision that and would want us to change the way we are represented. The oportunity for true self governing is laying in front of us. By the people and for the people is our core.

    Instead we're fighting party lines and concentrating on bringing democracy thru war to the world.
     
  6. ddrdan

    ddrdan Well-Known Member

    In the words of Flo (Progessive Insurance) "Man, your good!!!! What am I thinking right now?"

    You're a taco brain!
     
  7. GoWulfpack

    GoWulfpack Guest

    Umm.....because we aren't a socialist nation? Besides.....Obama promised "change" why are you settling for more of the same?
     
  8. GoWulfpack

    GoWulfpack Guest



    Winner winner chicken dinner!
     
  9. GoWulfpack

    GoWulfpack Guest

    Tacos?
     
  10. DontCareHowYouDoItInNY

    DontCareHowYouDoItInNY Well-Known Member

    He promised "change" and he is keeping his word. That's what we'll have left in our pockets when he is done.
     
  11. browns rule

    browns rule Guest

    :iagree:
    I couldn't have said it better!!
     
  12. Sherry A.

    Sherry A. Well-Known Member

    When a true Conservative understands that Obama did not start this bailout and thus the policies have had to be rewritten several times I'll worry about the POTUS pushing American products. Obama pushing any American made product is not a bad thing to me.

    Sherry
     
  13. Steeler_Fan

    Steeler_Fan Well-Known Member

    hmmm I don't recall what team your for, from this past season, but I am sure we will kick your butts again like last year.....:jester::jester::jester:
     
  14. GoWulfpack

    GoWulfpack Guest



    The GM bailout falls on Obama. Plain and simple.
     
  15. Wayne Stollings

    Wayne Stollings Well-Known Member

    As long as you do not let the politics get in the way of the truth ......


    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/20/b...l=1&adxnnlx=1245589417-Q/JWNkfONwqT8lkYnAtm/g

    WASHINGTON — The emergency bailout of General Motors and Chrysler announced by President Bush on Friday gives the companies a few months to get their businesses in order, but hands off to President-elect Barack Obama the difficult political task of ruling on their future.

    The plan pumps $13.4 billion by mid-January into the companies from the fund that Congress authorized to rescue the financial industry. But the two companies have until March 31 to produce a plan for long-term profitability, including concessions from unions, creditors, suppliers and dealers.

    In February, another $4 billion will be available for G.M. if the rest of the $700 billion bailout package has been released.
     
  16. GoWulfpack

    GoWulfpack Guest

    Bush is not innocent in this but this is what I'm referring to.....


    http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/firstread/archive/2009/06/01/1949329.aspx


     
  17. Wayne Stollings

    Wayne Stollings Well-Known Member

    :nopity:
     
  18. Panther Crazy

    Panther Crazy Well-Known Member

    What is your definition of a "true conservative"? Also, are you aware that GM has 2 production plants in Mexico, along with another that makes instrument panels? They also have plants in Japan and Enlgland, so President Obama is not pushing a strictly American product. Again, having a President hawking one product over another cheapens the office. In my opinion, we don't need a government run by Billy Mays and Vince The Sham-Wow Guy.
     
  19. Sherry A.

    Sherry A. Well-Known Member

    I am unable to in earnest answer your first question as I am about as confused as to what the definition is anymore than most people. Could you explain your definition of conservative to me?

    Yes, I know the geographical portions where the car manufacturers have plants. What does that have to do with selling an American held product? I want my leader getting my money back, don't you?

    Sherry
     
  20. Hught

    Hught Well-Known Member

Share This Page