Alaska funded Palin kids' travel

Discussion in 'Discussion Group' started by my4kiddies, Oct 21, 2008.

  1. shar824

    shar824 Well-Known Member

    How much did John Edwards spend?
     
  2. RealityCheck

    RealityCheck Well-Known Member


    Evidently not enough
     
  3. bandmom

    bandmom Well-Known Member

    If I remember correctly, it was $400.00 (for one hair cut).
     
  4. my4kiddies

    my4kiddies Well-Known Member



    Right but the state of alaska gets their money from the GOVERMENT ! :neutral:
     
  5. DAH22

    DAH22 Well-Known Member

    When we are invited to meetings of my dh the company pays for us too. All the time!
     
  6. my4kiddies

    my4kiddies Well-Known Member

    You obviously didn't read the article , It states that her kids were NOT invited to all of these meetings and such . Go back and read it , big difference between company and government meetings :x
     
  7. DAH22

    DAH22 Well-Known Member

    Obviously I would know what I read or not, and Sarah Palin noted the kids were invited... only SOME said they were surprised when they saw the children not ALL and some said that Plain requested her children to go with her. However, if I had the means to take my children with me I would too. So I did read the article and was only stating what "I" do on "MY" husbands trips that is all.
     
  8. shar824

    shar824 Well-Known Member

    Heck...this woman is d----d if she does and d-----d if she doesn't, horrible person for taking her kids, she would be a doubly horrible person if my goodness she went on these trips without them!!!! What kind of a mother does that??????

    Ain't worth talking about..talk with your vote.. :neutral:
     
  9. colinmama

    colinmama Guest

    This is seriously the smartest thing anyone has said on here in a while :cheers:
     
  10. my4kiddies

    my4kiddies Well-Known Member

    All im saying is its NOT right that the government is paying for this women to bring her kids with her , Your damn right i would want mine with me as well but WOULD NOT let the government pay for it ..Oh and someone said shes damned if she does and damned if she dont , Yea she is for wasting gov money to doing unnecessary things , Like bringing her kids whom were not invited and paying for hotel rooms for them , They stayed in a different room then their mother , Again wasting money . She needs to pay for those things from her and her husbands personal accounts . But i guess im wrong for thinking that's the RIGHT way of doing things ..
     
  11. Shadow Rider

    Shadow Rider Well-Known Member

    Nope, certainly not worth talking about fraud and wasting tax monies. Hey the taxpayers have plenty of it, just let them pay some more.
     
  12. my4kiddies

    my4kiddies Well-Known Member

    yea thats what im talking about , :neutral:
     
  13. Wayne Stollings

    Wayne Stollings Well-Known Member

    You mean like the previous governor of Alaska did when his family travelled with him? :mrgreen:
     
  14. Wayne Stollings

    Wayne Stollings Well-Known Member

    Seriously, it seems to me she is unable to see what is and is not ethical in the actions of a governmental employee/officer.
     
  15. my4kiddies

    my4kiddies Well-Known Member

    yes thank you :)
     
  16. myopinion

    myopinion Well-Known Member

    This is what's wrong with America now.People not putting family first.Big deal she took her family with her.
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2008
  17. my4kiddies

    my4kiddies Well-Known Member

    haha wow
     
  18. KDsGrandma

    KDsGrandma Well-Known Member

    No, I think you missed the point. When Tony Knowles, the previous governor, took his kids with him, he paid their way.
     
  19. my4kiddies

    my4kiddies Well-Known Member


    Thanks , Some people just dont get it
     
  20. Wayne Stollings

    Wayne Stollings Well-Known Member

    So you would not mind paying for say Obama's family to travel with him so he can put his family first? You see, that is the problem. It is not that she took her family with her but that she had the taxpayers she represented pay for it. If she had paid for it herself there would have been no issue.
     

Share This Page