This should make your blood boil

I'm not wearing my Judges Robe today.... :lol::lol:

 

There u go ASSUMING AGAIN!! You got something against FAT PEOPLE too??

Oh, and I am FAR from fat.........Mwah!

 

Sorry, I guess we shouldn't assume things now should we.

 

I mean really?????????????????

Still ..........................

 

Since you seem to have forgotten all you ever were siupposed to have learned about math, I will give you a refresher course.

If you had 100 marbles and you lost 50% of them you would have 50 left, which is what I said was the relationship between illegal immigrants and total Hispanic populations.

If you had 100 marbles and lost 97% of them you would have 3 left, which is what Eers said was the relationship between the illegal immigrants and total Mexican population.

Do you see the major difference between the two statements now?

 

i was thinking the same thing, good grief

 

Wayne... I saw what YOU put in post 110... Thats as clear as I need to see. Unless someone else posted it for you. Maybe you should re-read your own post #110, but you will still spin and pull and stretch what you wrote, and you want to lecture me on math... :ack::ack:

 

The bit where he said that if you can judge a citizens legality by looking at them, your racial tolerance might be questionable?

Scandalous.

 

If I need math lessons you need to see optometrist...

 

The quote you gave us that 50% of Mexicans here are legal residents cannot not possibly be true. The only way is fuzzy math. Your source is probably counting the children Mexicans are having as legal residents. To me if there parents are illegal, the children are to.

I guess all this won't matter soon anyway, Obama and Pelosi will soon make them all US citizens.

 

You seem to be saying half is the same as 97%.

Or is it just that it doesn't matter to you whether it's half or 97%?

 

So you still do not understand the difference between 50% of something and 97% of the same something and it is somehow my fault?

 

To use simple explanations 50% + 50% = 100% which is ABOUT what I said since the percentage is not exact where black is illegal and red is legal.

On the other hand 97% + 3% = 100%, which is what Eers said where black is illegal and red is legal. This is saying there are about twice as many illegals and 1/17 the number of legals which is not the same nor is it even close.

 

Ok, I used YOUR information on the number of illegal residents so you gave us untrue information.

No, it is simple math although it does seem to be more than some here can comprehend.

That would be your source, right?

Ahh, you rewrote the Constitution all on your own did you?

I know a few we could afford to trade to Mexico to help even it out. You have had your shots, right? :mrgreen:

 

The Consitution never took into account millions of illegals having children now did it.

I have been to some very dark places on this earth and had more shots than even your Phd buddies could count.

I actually enjoy going to Mexico. The beaches are some of the best in the world. The food, drink and the PEOPLE are great there to. I just don't like the ones who don't care about our laws and yes they broke the law soon as they crossed that border.

 

I said 97% of MEXICANS in NC are here illegally, that includes their offsprings. How has all them here became legal? PLEASE answer that one for me. I guess the immigration fairy granted them all asylum.

 

Saying something and being able to back up what you say are two very different things. You say a lot based on what you believe not what actually is the case.

 

Just answer the question, HOW DID THEY BECOME LEGAL?

 

I know what you mean turtletits.